A MUST READ!! THIS IS A GOOD ONE!! BELIEVE IT OR NOT.

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
Saturday Dec. 13, 2003; 11:08 p.m. EST
9/11 Bombshell: Mohamed Atta Trained in Baghdad

A bombshell memo written to Saddam Hussein in 2001 and recently uncovered by Iraq's new coalition government shows that lead 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta was trained to attack the U.S. in Baghdad.

The memo, authored by Iraqi intelligence chief Tahir Jalil Habbush al-Tikriti, is dated July 1, 2001 and describes the "work program" undertaken by Atta at a base in Baghdad run by notorious Palestinian terrorist Abu Nidal, reports London's Sunday Telegraph, which obtained the document exclusively.

If authentic, the document would be the first explicit evidence implicating Iraq in the attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, since it makes a direct reference to what appears to be the 9/11 plot.

In one passage, the Iraqi intelligence chief reportedly informs Saddam that Atta had demonstrated his capability as leader of the team "responsible for attacking the targets that we have agreed to destroy."

Iraqi officials refused to disclose how and where they had obtained the document, the paper said. But Dr. Ayad Allawi, a member of Iraq's ruling seven-man Presidential Committee, said the document was genuine.

"We are uncovering evidence all the time of Saddam's involvement with al-Qaeda," he told the Telegraph. "But this is the most compelling piece of evidence that we have found so far. It shows that not only did Saddam have contacts with al-Qaeda, he had contact with those responsible for the September 11 attacks."

In October 2001, two Iraqi defectors told U.S. intelligence that they helped train militant Muslim fundamentalists to overcome U.S. flight crews using hijacking techniques never seen before 9/11 at a south Baghdad training camp known as Salman Pak.

One of the defectors, Sabah Khodada, subsequently told PBS that he believed the 9/11 attacks were perpetrated by "graduates of Salman Pak."

In what could turn out to be one of the greatest intelligence blunders of the post-9/11 era, the CIA and FBI dismissed Khodada and other eyewitness accounts of the hijack training regimen at Salman Pak, though their story was corroborated by satellite photography showing the fuselage of the airliner on which they trained.

The Telegraph report makes no mention of Salman Pak or the accounts from eyewitnesses suggesting the camp may have played a role in 9/11.

Editor's note:
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
818
Tokens
Patriot,

I looked on about 5 diferent new site, like Fox News, CNN, USA Today, Reuters, etc.
and have seen no mention. What is your source?
 

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Tokens
Let's assume for a moment that this document is in fact authentic ... why, when a vast majority of the international community don't buy the notion that Saddam and Osama were in cahoots, only quote "responsible for attacking the targets that we have agreed to destroy" fromt he document? Why not state something a little more specific, since the article goes on to say that this provides direct evidence?

At any rate, it doesn't change the fact that evidence to support a unity between Saddam and Al-Qaeda has been discovered AFTER the war broke out. The 'War on Terror' title given to the Iraqi invasion still goes down as self-serving propaganda, objectionable regardless of any forthcoming supporting evidence.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
I saw Con Coughlin on meet the depressed and he has checked and double checked and said that the document was in fact authentic.
C.Coughlin is a very credible journalist and nes reporter.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,172
Messages
13,564,895
Members
100,753
Latest member
aw8vietnam
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com